glitchier-soc/spec/services/block_service_spec.rb
Claire e38fc319dc
Refactor and improve tests (#17386)
* Change account and user fabricators to simplify and improve tests

- `Fabricate(:account)` implicitly fabricates an associated `user` if
  no `domain` attribute is given (an account with `domain: nil` is
  considered a local account, but no user record was created), unless
  `user: nil` is passed
- `Fabricate(:account, user: Fabricate(:user))` should still be possible
  but is discouraged.

* Fix and refactor tests

- avoid passing unneeded attributes to `Fabricate(:user)` or
  `Fabricate(:account)`
- avoid embedding `Fabricate(:user)` into a `Fabricate(:account)` or the other
  way around
- prefer `Fabricate(:user, account_attributes: …)` to
  `Fabricate(:user, account: Fabricate(:account, …)`
- also, some tests were using remote accounts with local user records, which is
  not representative of production code.
2022-01-28 00:46:42 +01:00

36 lines
937 B
Ruby

require 'rails_helper'
RSpec.describe BlockService, type: :service do
let(:sender) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'alice') }
subject { BlockService.new }
describe 'local' do
let(:bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob') }
before do
subject.call(sender, bob)
end
it 'creates a blocking relation' do
expect(sender.blocking?(bob)).to be true
end
end
describe 'remote ActivityPub' do
let(:bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob', protocol: :activitypub, domain: 'example.com', inbox_url: 'http://example.com/inbox') }
before do
stub_request(:post, 'http://example.com/inbox').to_return(status: 200)
subject.call(sender, bob)
end
it 'creates a blocking relation' do
expect(sender.blocking?(bob)).to be true
end
it 'sends a block activity' do
expect(a_request(:post, 'http://example.com/inbox')).to have_been_made.once
end
end
end