There are two motivations for this: 1. It looks like we're going to add other features that require server-side storage (e.g. user notes). 2. Namespacing glitchsoc modifications is a good idea anyway: even if we do not end up doing (1), if upstream introduces a keyword-mute feature that also uses a "KeywordMute" model, we can avoid some merge conflicts this way and work on the more interesting task of choosing which implementation to use. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| controllers | ||
| helpers | ||
| javascript | ||
| lib | ||
| mailers | ||
| models | ||
| policies | ||
| presenters | ||
| serializers | ||
| services | ||
| validators | ||
| views | ||
| workers | ||