Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Upstream has changed how Tesseract.js gets included and dropped a dependency.
The conflict is caused by glitch-soc having different code due to its
theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream refactor/code style change in a place we replaced upstream's
repo URL with ours.
Ported upstram changes, keeping our repo URL.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dropped dependencies, one of which was textually too close to
a glitch-soc-specific dependency. Not a real conflict.
* [WiP] Update Tesseract.js
- Update Tesseract.js to 2.2.1
- Use versioned file names
- differentiate two progression states: preparing OCR and detecting picture
* Get rid of copy-webpack-plugin
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc change related to
instance-local toots. Merged upstream changes.
- `app/services/fan_out_on_write_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's handling of Direct Messages,
merged upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, caused by glitch-soc-only dependencies
being textually too close to updated upstream dependencies.
Merged upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having to take care of local-only
pinned toots in that controller.
Took upstream's changes and restored the local-only special
handling.
- `app/controllers/auth/sessions_controller.rb`:
Minor conflicts due to the theming system, applied upstream
changes, adapted the following two files for glitch-soc's
theming system:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/controllers/concerns/two_factor_authentication_concern.rb`
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc having to handle local-only
toots specially. Applied upstream changes and restored
the local-only special handling.
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to the theming system.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependency updated, too close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency in the file.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (with_rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/services/post_status_service.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream adding a new parameter (rate_limit),
too close to glitch-soc's own additional parameter (content_type).
Added upstream's parameter.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Conflict due to us not exposing theme settings here (as we have
a different flavour/skin menu).
Took upstream change, while still not exposing theme settings.
- `config/webpack/shared.js`:
Coding style fixes for a part we have rewritten.
Discarded upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- app/services/remove_status_service.rb
Conflict because we still handle the direct timeline.
Took upstream changes, with that one extra function call.
- config/locales/ca.yml
Conflict because theme names were updated.
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
- config/locales/oc.yml
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
- config/locales/pl.yml
Decided to *keep* the theme names even if they are useless
to avoid future conflicts.
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/settings/follower_domains_controller.rb
Removed upstream. Did the same here. Maybe we should not have?
- config/locales/en.yml
Upstream removed the “Authorized followers” page and associated
translations. This is too close in the file to our glitch-soc-specific
“flavour” string. No actual conflict.
- config/locales/ja.yml
Same as above.
- config/locales/pl.yml
Same as above.
- config/navigation.rb
No real conflict. New route added too close to the glitch-soc-specific
“flavours” one.
- config/webpack/configuration.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- config/webpack/loaders/babel.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
The contents of this file have been moved to package.json.
- config/webpack/shared.js
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- config/webpacker.yml
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- jest.config.js
The contents of this file have been moved to package.json.
- package.json
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
- yarn.lock
Upstream refactored the webpack(er) configuration quite a bit.
Tried to keep up.
Webpacker (Ruby wrapper to webpack) uses RAILS_ENV-based environments while
the javascript configuration for webpack re-reads this configuration file using
the NODE_ENV environment variable. This means that when RAILS_ENV=test, running
“assets:precompile” compiled the production packs in “public/packs” while
webpacker expects them in “public/packs-test”. This causes Ruby to recompile
them on-the-fly, possibly leading to race conditions in parallel_tests.
This changes:
- Disables on-the-fly compilation in test environment
- Changes the javascript part to read the correct environment
Webpacker (Ruby wrapper to webpack) uses RAILS_ENV-based environments while
the javascript configuration for webpack re-reads this configuration file using
the NODE_ENV environment variable. This means that when RAILS_ENV=test, running
“assets:precompile” compiled the production packs in “public/packs” while
webpacker expects them in “public/packs-test”. This causes Ruby to recompile
them on-the-fly, possibly leading to race conditions in parallel_tests.
This changes:
- Disables on-the-fly compilation in test environment
- Changes the javascript part to read the correct environment
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
Dockerfile
app/javascript/packs/common.js
config/webpack/loaders/sass.js
config/webpack/shared.js
db/schema.rb
package.json
yarn.lock
A lot of the conflicts come from updating webpack.
Even though upstream deleted app/javascript/packs/common.js, I kept
glitch-soc's version as it unifies JS/CSS packs behavior across flavours.
Ported glitch changes to webpack 4.x
