* Fix compose form submission reloading web interface
Fix regression introduced by #19742
* Fix various compose form buttons being handled like submit buttons
* Fix coding style issue
* Fix missing onClick prop check
* Add editing for published statuses
* Fix change of multiple-choice boolean in poll not resetting votes
* Remove the ability to update existing media attachments for now
* Fix ComposeForm being mounted twice in mobile view
Fixes#13094
* Fix compose form focus and pre-selection behavior in mobile view
* Split _updateFocusAndSelection out of componentDidUpdate
* Refactor selectComposeSuggestion so that different paths can be updated
* Add suggestions in CW field
* Add emoji suggestion to poll options
* Attempt to fix CSS
* Hide suggestions by default
They will be enabled if the input has focus
* Refactor uses of icons to an Icon component in web UI
* Refactor options passed to the Icon component
* Make tests work with absolute component paths
There is no reason to disable the composer textarea when some media metadata
is being modified, nor is there any reason to focus the textarea when some
media metadata has been modified (prevents clicking one image's description
field right after having modified another).
* Revert "Fix some icon names changed by the Font Awesome 5. (#8796)"
This reverts commit c8a1e945d9.
* Revert "Migrate to font-awesome 5.0. (#8799)"
This reverts commit ae20afbc80.
* Revert "Fix some icons names, unavailable in fontawesome5 (free license). (#8792)"
This reverts commit 30b1bb0704.
* Revert "Update the icon name changed by the Font Awesome 5. (#8776)"
This reverts commit 84bcf89764.
* Revert "Add bot icon to bot avatars and migrate to newer version of Font Awesome (#8484)"
This reverts commit cc784f3c16.
* Remove Collapsable and use CSS instead
* Put the CW field between the toot we are replying to and the toot field
* Use same spacing between all fields in the composing column
* Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs
Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in
JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when
working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme,
so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple,
and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely
be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use
appear to support this working properly.
BREAKING CHANGE:
The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the
REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few
changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change,
but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely
different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles
this with no problems, however.)
Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided
to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted
to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers
represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their
problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once
for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID
value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON
in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that
the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most
cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or
delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the
API is different than the actual identifier associated with the
message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API
users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate.
1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html
* Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON
These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try
to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are
legitimate, but these were not.)
Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers:
~~~
no-restricted-syntax:
- warn
- selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal)
message: Avoid the use of unary +
- selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number']
message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers
~~~
The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices,
one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number.
* Back out RelationshipsController Change
This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to
do with this branch.
* Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well
Per
https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452
we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not
integers.
