* Run rubocop --autocorrect on app/, config/ and lib/, also manually fix some remaining style issues
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on db/
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on `spec/` and fix remaining issues
* Run rubocop --autocorrect on app/, config/ and lib/, also manually fix some remaining style issues
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on db/
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on `spec/` and fix remaining issues
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end, glitch-soc had extra entries at the end.
Added upstream's new line before glitch-soc's.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Upstream updated dependencies while glitch-soc has an extra one (hcaptcha).
Updated dependencies like upstream did.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a parameter (`allowed_mentions`) where
glitch-soc already had an extra one (`content_type`).
Added upstream's new parameter.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto-mono.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end, glitch-soc had extra entries at the end.
Added upstream's new line before glitch-soc's.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Upstream updated dependencies while glitch-soc has an extra one (hcaptcha).
Updated dependencies like upstream did.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a parameter (`allowed_mentions`) where
glitch-soc already had an extra one (`content_type`).
Added upstream's new parameter.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto-mono.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
There is an idempotency key generated by clients when authoring a post,
and stored in Redis, to ensure that if a user or client retries posting
the same status, we don't get a duplicate.
Hachyderm.io has been experiencing some filesystem and database
performance issues, causing database writes to be slow. This can mean
that there are successful posts, but the reverse proxy returns 504
Gateway Timeout before the idempotency status has been updated; users or
clients who retry (such as Tusky which retries automatically, see
tuskyapp/Tusky#2951) can re-try the same post with the same idempotency
key before it has actually been recorded in Redis, leading to duplicate
posts.
To address this issue, move all of the database updates after the
initial transaction that creates the status into the
`postprocess_status!` method, so we can insert the idempotency key
immediately after the status has been created, significantly reducing
the window in which the status could be created but the idempotency key
not yet stored.
Note: this has not yet been tested; I'm submitting this PR for
discussion and to offer to the Hachyderm.io admins to try out to fix the
multiple posting problem.
Co-authored-by: Brian Campbell <brcampbell@beta.team>
There is an idempotency key generated by clients when authoring a post,
and stored in Redis, to ensure that if a user or client retries posting
the same status, we don't get a duplicate.
Hachyderm.io has been experiencing some filesystem and database
performance issues, causing database writes to be slow. This can mean
that there are successful posts, but the reverse proxy returns 504
Gateway Timeout before the idempotency status has been updated; users or
clients who retry (such as Tusky which retries automatically, see
tuskyapp/Tusky#2951) can re-try the same post with the same idempotency
key before it has actually been recorded in Redis, leading to duplicate
posts.
To address this issue, move all of the database updates after the
initial transaction that creates the status into the
`postprocess_status!` method, so we can insert the idempotency key
immediately after the status has been created, significantly reducing
the window in which the status could be created but the idempotency key
not yet stored.
Note: this has not yet been tested; I'm submitting this PR for
discussion and to offer to the Hachyderm.io admins to try out to fix the
multiple posting problem.
Co-authored-by: Brian Campbell <brcampbell@beta.team>
Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream updated media and edit-related code textually close to glitch-soc
additions (local-only and content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/status_edit.rb`:
Upstream changes textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (directMessage attribute).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (DM timeline).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Upstream fixed an issue with language selection. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `db/schema.rb`:
Upstream added columns to the `status_edits` table, the conflict is because
of an additional column (`content-type`) in glitch-soc.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency (express) textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific one
(favico.js) got updated.
Updated it as well.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream updated media and edit-related code textually close to glitch-soc
additions (local-only and content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/status_edit.rb`:
Upstream changes textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (directMessage attribute).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (DM timeline).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Upstream fixed an issue with language selection. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `db/schema.rb`:
Upstream added columns to the `status_edits` table, the conflict is because
of an additional column (`content-type`) in glitch-soc.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency (express) textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific one
(favico.js) got updated.
Updated it as well.
* Change how changes to media attachments are stored for edits
Fix not being able to re-order media attachments
* Fix not broadcasting updates when polls/media is changed through ActivityPub
* Various fixes and improvements
* Update app/models/report.rb
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
* Add tracking of media attachment description changes
* Change poll in status edit to have a structure closer to the real one
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
* Change how changes to media attachments are stored for edits
Fix not being able to re-order media attachments
* Fix not broadcasting updates when polls/media is changed through ActivityPub
* Various fixes and improvements
* Update app/models/report.rb
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
* Add tracking of media attachment description changes
* Change poll in status edit to have a structure closer to the real one
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/tags/index.html.haml`:
Removed upstream while it had changes in glitch-soc to accomodate for the
theming system.
Additional changes to accomodate for the theming system:
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/preview_card_providers/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/tags/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/tags/show.html.haml`
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/tags/index.html.haml`:
Removed upstream while it had changes in glitch-soc to accomodate for the
theming system.
Additional changes to accomodate for the theming system:
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/preview_card_providers/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/links/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/trends/tags/index.html.haml`
- `app/views/admin/tags/show.html.haml`
* Add trending links
* Add overriding specific links trendability
* Add link type to preview cards and only trend articles
Change trends review notifications from being sent every 5 minutes to being sent every 2 hours
Change threshold from 5 unique accounts to 15 unique accounts
* Fix tests
* Add trending links
* Add overriding specific links trendability
* Add link type to preview cards and only trend articles
Change trends review notifications from being sent every 5 minutes to being sent every 2 hours
Change threshold from 5 unique accounts to 15 unique accounts
* Fix tests
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
- `app/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml`
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/admin/dashboard_controller.rb`:
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
- `app/views/admin/dashboard/index.html.haml`
Upstream completely redesigned the admin dashboard.
glitch-soc tracked extra features, but that list is
gone.
Followed upstram.
Mastodon enforces the “sensitive” flag on media attachments whenever a toot
is posted with a Content Warning. However, it does so *after* potentially
converting the Content Warning to toot text (when there is no toot text),
which leads to inconsistent and surprising behavior for API clients.
This commit fixes this inconsistency.
Mastodon enforces the “sensitive” flag on media attachments whenever a toot
is posted with a Content Warning. However, it does so *after* potentially
converting the Content Warning to toot text (when there is no toot text),
which leads to inconsistent and surprising behavior for API clients.
This commit fixes this inconsistency.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Our README.md files are completely different. Discarded upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Updating rails-ujs, no real conflict, but a comment to close to changed
code. Various glitch-soc-only files have been updated to match those changes,
though.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, just an additional dependency in glitch-soc that was too
close to something updated upstream. Took upstream's changes.
