* fix RuboCop error
RuboCop doesn't work by following error.
```
$ rubocop
Error: The `Style/TrailingCommaInLiteral` cop no longer exists. Please use `Style/TrailingCommaInArrayLiteral` and/or `Style/TrailingCommaInHashLiteral` instead.
(obsolete configuration found in .rubocop.yml, please update it)
```
it comes from RuboCop 0.53.0 [\[Fix #3394\] Separate Array & Hash Literal Comma configuration by garettarrowood · Pull Request #5307 · bbatsov/rubocop](https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/pull/5307)
* ci(CodeClimate): specify RuboCop version 0.54
* https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/rubocop#section-using-rubocop-s-newer-versions
* [RuboCop 0.55.0 is not available yet](https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate-rubocop/issues/121) on CodeClimate rubocop channel
* fix RuboCop error
RuboCop doesn't work by following error.
```
$ rubocop
Error: The `Style/TrailingCommaInLiteral` cop no longer exists. Please use `Style/TrailingCommaInArrayLiteral` and/or `Style/TrailingCommaInHashLiteral` instead.
(obsolete configuration found in .rubocop.yml, please update it)
```
it comes from RuboCop 0.53.0 [\[Fix #3394\] Separate Array & Hash Literal Comma configuration by garettarrowood · Pull Request #5307 · bbatsov/rubocop](https://github.com/bbatsov/rubocop/pull/5307)
* ci(CodeClimate): specify RuboCop version 0.54
* https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/rubocop#section-using-rubocop-s-newer-versions
* [RuboCop 0.55.0 is not available yet](https://github.com/codeclimate/codeclimate-rubocop/issues/121) on CodeClimate rubocop channel
Also add an apply_to_mentions attribute on Glitch::KeywordMute, which is
used to calculate scope. Next up: additions to the test suite to
demonstrate how scoping works.
Also add an apply_to_mentions attribute on Glitch::KeywordMute, which is
used to calculate scope. Next up: additions to the test suite to
demonstrate how scoping works.
Old statuses and statuses from Pawoo, which runs a modified version of
Mastodon, may not have been marked sensitive even if spoiler text is
present.
Such statuses are still not marked sensitve if they are local or
arrived before version upgrade. Marking recently fetched remote status
sensitive contradicts the behavior.
Considering what people expected when they authored such statuses, this
change removes the sensitivity enforcement.
Old statuses and statuses from Pawoo, which runs a modified version of
Mastodon, may not have been marked sensitive even if spoiler text is
present.
Such statuses are still not marked sensitve if they are local or
arrived before version upgrade. Marking recently fetched remote status
sensitive contradicts the behavior.
Considering what people expected when they authored such statuses, this
change removes the sensitivity enforcement.
This has a couple of advantages over the regex approach:
- Keywords are individually addressable, which makes it easier to gather
statistics (#363)
- Keywords can be individually applied to different feeds, e.g. skipping
mentions (#454)
It *does* end up creating many more Regexp objects. I'm not yet sure if
the difference is significant.
This has a couple of advantages over the regex approach:
- Keywords are individually addressable, which makes it easier to gather
statistics (#363)
- Keywords can be individually applied to different feeds, e.g. skipping
mentions (#454)
It *does* end up creating many more Regexp objects. I'm not yet sure if
the difference is significant.
