Change `account_link_to` to use an image tag rather than some
inline CSS. Dropped the `size` parameter in the process, but it wasn't
used for anything except the default value of 36px.
Dropped CSS rules that were always overriden, and defaulted to 36px width
and height instead.
Change `account_link_to` to use an image tag rather than some
inline CSS. Dropped the `size` parameter in the process, but it wasn't
used for anything except the default value of 36px.
Dropped CSS rules that were always overriden, and defaulted to 36px width
and height instead.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Upstream disabled the embed controller for reblogs.
Not a real conflict, but glitch-soc has an extra line to deal
with its theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream made changes to get rid of most inline CSS, this changes
javascript for public pages, which in glitch are split between
different files. Ported those changes.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream changed the block check in `Status#permitted_for` to
include domain-block checks. Not a real conflict with glitch-soc,
but our scope is slightly different, as our scope for
unauthenticated access do not include instance-local toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a new field to the instance
serializer, the conflict is one line above since we added more of
that.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of most inline CSS and moved hidden elements
to data attributes in the process, in fields were we have
different values.
Ported upstream changes while keeping our glitch-specific
values.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of inline CSS on an HAML line we treat
differently, stripping empty text nodes.
Ported upstream changes to the style attribute, keeping
the empty text node stripping behavior.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Upstream disabled the embed controller for reblogs.
Not a real conflict, but glitch-soc has an extra line to deal
with its theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream made changes to get rid of most inline CSS, this changes
javascript for public pages, which in glitch are split between
different files. Ported those changes.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream changed the block check in `Status#permitted_for` to
include domain-block checks. Not a real conflict with glitch-soc,
but our scope is slightly different, as our scope for
unauthenticated access do not include instance-local toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a new field to the instance
serializer, the conflict is one line above since we added more of
that.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of most inline CSS and moved hidden elements
to data attributes in the process, in fields were we have
different values.
Ported upstream changes while keeping our glitch-specific
values.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of inline CSS on an HAML line we treat
differently, stripping empty text nodes.
Ported upstream changes to the style attribute, keeping
the empty text node stripping behavior.
When deduplicating account usernames for OAuthable users, the routine did check if any account was known with that username, including remote accounts. This caused some unnecessary deduplication, and usernames ending with unexpected trailing _1.
This fixes#13580
When deduplicating account usernames for OAuthable users, the routine did check if any account was known with that username, including remote accounts. This caused some unnecessary deduplication, and usernames ending with unexpected trailing _1.
This fixes#13580
* Move .back-button inline styles to CSS file
All occurrences of the back-button CSS class used the same inline
CSS rules, so moved them over to the CSS file
* Fix “Add new domain block” button using inline CSS
* Replace common pattern of inline-styled button boxes by a CSS class
In particular, switching from `float: left/right` to a flexbox with
`justify-content: space-between`. This implied changing the order of
a few HTML tags and adding an empty `div` in one case.
Also removed a `margin-bottom` rule that wasn't needed due to the
margins of surrounding elements.
* Move account admin view inline CSS to CSS file
* Move .back-button inline styles to CSS file
All occurrences of the back-button CSS class used the same inline
CSS rules, so moved them over to the CSS file
* Fix “Add new domain block” button using inline CSS
* Replace common pattern of inline-styled button boxes by a CSS class
In particular, switching from `float: left/right` to a flexbox with
`justify-content: space-between`. This implied changing the order of
a few HTML tags and adding an empty `div` in one case.
Also removed a `margin-bottom` rule that wasn't needed due to the
margins of surrounding elements.
* Move account admin view inline CSS to CSS file
