Reminder: Suggestions were added in #7918 and are based on who you
interact with who you do not follow. E.g. if you boost someone a lot
from seeing other people's boosts of that person, it makes sense you
might be interested in following the original source; or if you reply
to someone a lot, maybe you'd want to follow them
Each suggestion can be dismissed
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
Fixes#395
Instead of leaving the toot body blank, it replaces it with a single “.” in
order for the fold/unfold CW behavior to not look *too* weird on upstream
Mastodon. Note that this does not fix upstream's CW-dropping behavior, as
that is decided at the time the toot is posted, not received.
* Fix position of the domain label
* Fix position of the domain label for RTL
- Fix color mismatch of linear gradient which assigned to "::after" pseudo class
Indeed, when the “Always enable the Content Warning field” setting is enabled,
sending a content-less toot with a CW would move the CW to the toot's content
and leave the toot not marked as sensitive.
Previously, the server would attempt taking port/socket in worker
process, and if it was taken, fail, which made the master process
create a new worker. This led to really high CPU usage if the
streaming API was started when the port or socket were not
available.
Now, before clustering (forking) into worker processes, a test
server is created and then removed to check if it can be done.