glitchier-soc/app/models/follow_request.rb

47 lines
1.2 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
# == Schema Information
#
# Table name: follow_requests
#
# id :bigint(8) not null, primary key
# created_at :datetime not null
# updated_at :datetime not null
# account_id :bigint(8) not null
# target_account_id :bigint(8) not null
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 16:00:35 +02:00
# show_reblogs :boolean default(TRUE), not null
# uri :string
#
class FollowRequest < ApplicationRecord
2016-12-26 20:30:45 +02:00
include Paginable
include RelationshipCacheable
2016-12-26 20:30:45 +02:00
belongs_to :account
belongs_to :target_account, class_name: 'Account'
has_one :notification, as: :activity, dependent: :destroy
validates :account_id, uniqueness: { scope: :target_account_id }
validates_with FollowLimitValidator, on: :create
def authorize!
account.follow!(target_account, reblogs: show_reblogs, uri: uri)
2017-01-26 04:56:26 +02:00
MergeWorker.perform_async(target_account.id, account.id)
destroy!
end
alias reject! destroy!
def local?
false # Force uri_for to use uri attribute
end
before_validation :set_uri, only: :create
private
def set_uri
self.uri = ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.generate_uri_for(self) if uri.nil?
end
end